free hit
counters
Interesting recollection of Lotus/Proton tie-up... - Lotus / Motoring / Cars Chat - The Lotus Forums #ForTheOwners Jump to content


Interesting recollection of Lotus/Proton tie-up...


Recommended Posts

Hello, my name's Dan and I'm here to get better... for some time now I've had an unhealthy fixation with British Leyland products, and have been regularly reading www.aronline.co.uk... You know, perhaps the Maestro wasn't that bad after all, coming as it did as a spiritual successor to the Princess and Ambassador... :scared:

Ahem. Back to the plot. A recent blog post from Chris Sawyer, recalling his time as Communications Director for Lotus Cars USA is enlightening...

Through long-term friendships with Lotus personnel, many stretching back over 20 years, and my time as the Communications Director of Lotus Cars USA Inc. (LCU) – a position that was the main focus of my employment at a Detroit-based PR agency, I received regular reports about the goings on in Hethel during the Proton-Lotus courtship and early years of the marriage. Here are a few of the highlights:

  • Romano Artioli reportedly paid General Motors $40 million for Lotus, but Lotus Engineering received $40 million in engineering contracts from the nearly bankrupt automaker to take Lotus off its hands.
  • Artioli deftly played Daewoo against Proton in an attempt to get the highest possible sale price for Lotus. The amount he ultimately received from Proton for an 80% holding was many times the asset value of a company that was technically bankrupt.
  • Daewoo didn’t want Atlanta, Gerogia-based Lotus Cars USA, so Artioli sold it to LCU CEO James G. Selwa for a rumored £1.00 to seal the deal. (It may have been more.) Daewoo had no use for a US sales arm as it was in the process of creating its own ground-up sales and distribution organization. Selwa, seeing a prime opportunity, jumped at the deal.
  • Proton, which talked of selling its cars in the US, didn’t have a sales organization in-country, and bought LCU back from Selwa for many times what he paid once the company had bought Lotus.
  • Had it acted on pleas from its British management, Honda might have bought Lotus outright. The company was impressed with the work done on a British-built variant of the Civic and was interested in expanding its sports car reach in light of its involvement in F1. Honda’s management in Japan never responded to the British managers’ pleas.
  • Proton’s late CEO Yahaya Ahmad reportedly flipped an Esprit on the Lotus test track after the signing ceremony, earning himself the nickname “Flipper” at LCU.
  • Malaysian dignitaries and company executives were stunned to discover that the paperwork turning Lotus over to Proton did not include Team Lotus. One witness described the scene: “Some were ashen-faced, others red as beets.” Some Malaysians also expected to own Classic Team Lotus as part of the deal – so much for due diligence.
  • Proton brought a number of its Mitsubishi Colt-based hatchbacks to the celebration and these were run on the Lotus test track. Reportedly, most of the cars’ front wheel bearings gave up after three laps.
  • Lotus race car drive Doc Bundy was able to get the Elise an appearance on Baywatch. The plot had a rich businessman helped/rescued by Pam Anderson. As a token of his thanks, the businessman would give her an Elise. With no commitment from the UK to sell the Elise Stateside, the idea floated off to sea.
  • During the initial development of the Elise GT (a Ferrari Dino-like closed coupe version of the Elise), Lotus was looking for an engine other than the KV6 to power the car in order to make US sales easier. Through personal contacts, I helped source the 250bhp Ford SVT Contour (Mondeo) 2.5-litre V6 and five-speed transaxle. Incoming CEO Chris Knight cancelled the project as being too expensive and too dissimilar to the standard Elise.
  • The M250 took the Elise GT’s place and was to be powered by a Lotus-modified Renault V6 with 250bhp. Initial development costs for the M250 were pegged at £60 million, far greater than the $7 million needed to take the Elise S1 from an idea and into production. Group Lotus made just £65 million that year.
  • Over the course of a month, four Senior Engineers at Lotus whittled the cost of the M250 below £20 million, with more to come. However, bickering with Renault over payment for modifications to its V6 engine (Lotus was to receive the engine for free in return for engineering the tweaks) killed the deal.
  • At various times, LCU was to receive the K-Series Elise, a KV6-powered Elise or a Lotus-badged and bodied version of the Vauxhall VX220 with a GM turbo motor. Management dithering meant none ever made it past the talking stage.
  • Lotus Engineer and Director Roger Becker became so frustrated with the roadblocks preventing production of a Federal Elise that he investigated a number of alternatives.
  • One option reportedly involved building Dodge Neon SRT-powered drag car kits to be sold through So-Cal Speed Shops. This would establish Elise production in the US and pave the way for a US-built Elise built in partnership with a third party. This would reduce Lotus’ exposure at a time when it was considering pulling out of the US market.
  • Concurrently, Lotus bought MARCO Engineering in Ann Arbor, Michigan. (It’s now known as Lotus Engineering, Inc.) In addition to its work testing and developing engines for the American car companies, Harley-Davidson, and small engine manufacturers, MARCO had enough extra room to build the Elise in CKD form. Worries that the United Auto Workers would want to represent the Lotus workers, as well as more dithering from Hethel, killed this idea.
  • Later on, Becker used his personal relationship with top Toyota managers to procure the 2ZZ-GE inline four. The agreement did not include the Denso engine control unit, which would have cost Lotus more than it could afford.
  • In order to save the project, Becker had new LCU CEO Arnie Johnson buy a Toyota Celica GT and ship it back to Hethel. A new Lotus-designed ECU – which eliminated the torque spike Denso and Toyota said could not be controlled by the engine electronics – was produced in two weeks. The engine was placed in an old Elise S1 test hack for presentation to the same Lotus management who had not been consulted about buying the Toyota. Unsurprisingly, the programme was soon approved after that.

These are just some of the things I saw and heard while trying to keep Lotus relevant to a jaded press community, which was tired of trying to find something else other than the over 20 year-old Esprit to write, and working against the near-constant threat that Lotus would leave the American market.

Despite all of the maddening decisions, or lack thereof, made during this time, I can say Tony Rudd had it right when he called his autobiography It Was Fun! However, if I ever write a book about my time at LCU, I may use the title suggested by Andrew Walmsley, a former Director at Lotus: Casualties of a Previous Summer. Somehow, that seems more appropriate…

Copied&pasted from here.

Dan

"He who dies with the most toys wins..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upgrade today to remove Google ads and support TLF.
  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello, my name's Dan and I'm here to get better... for some time now I've had an unhealthy fixation with British Leyland products, and have been regularly reading www.aronline.co.uk... You know, perhaps the Maestro wasn't that bad after all, coming as it did as a spiritual successor to the Princess and Ambassador... :scared:

MG Metro Turbo, MontegoTurbo and Maestro Turbos (and the Twin Plenum Rover Vitesse) all engineered at Lotus.

Enjoyed reading the article, has that couldnt make up such a story ring of truth about it.

SUNP0003-1.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how much of a two way relationship it was with Lotus, the ECV3 concept was well ahead of Elise

The 1983 ECV 3 used aluminium "Base Unit Construction" which is similar in concept to Lotus VVA.

Base Unit Construction was pioneered by Rover Engineer Spen King and first used on a Rover Gas Turbine powered concept 4 door saloon, that ultimately became the 1963 Rover 2000.

The car utilised a rigid steel monocoque chassis, and cage, on to which all of the unstressed body panels (steel and aluminium )were bolted and screwed to, the ECV 3 used a version of this made out of aluminium,with composite and aluminium outer panels which I guess was definately a forunner of Lotuses VVA method of building the Elise etc.

As for did Lotus engineer the ECV 3 structure, no it was done in house at Gayden by Austin-Rover with help from Alcan aluminium.

Other vehicles that later used adaptations of Rovers Base Unit Construction were the 1983 to88 Pontiac Fiero, 1991 to97 Pontiac Transport/Chevrolet Lumina people movers and GM's Saturn Division in the USA.

Lotus Engineering did suspension work on the Fiero in 1986--87 for the '88 model year so its entirely feasable the Fieros rear engined structure was extensively evaluated and the design morphed into the Aluminium VVA used for the Elise in 1995.

Edited by billy fish
SUNP0003-1.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Upgrade today to remove Google ads and support TLF.


×
×
  • Create New...