pan 3 Posted June 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 On 30 May 2016 at 01:56, sailorbob said: I would not recommend using the PUK chip #'6 as they claim it runs 1.25 bar of boost which, when the MAP sensor can only measure up to ~2.07 bar absolute, is not not a good idea. What is the "catch" code of your ecu and the PROM ID of the original chip? Today I tested the car, the maximum MAP is 2.24, is it represented 1.25 bar of boost? I will try to upload the file from freescan to show how the MAP changes and how the wastegate DC changes with Chip#6 On 30 May 2016 at 05:10, sailorbob said: You could try asking PUK, maybe they will tell you. And I got reply from Marcus of PUK, he claimed that #3 would give more torque than #6 from low to midrange Rev....I will order the Chip#3 and get the data from Freescan again Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vulcan Grey 251 Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 The MAP in Freescan is not correct. You can use Espritmon for a better reading. Quote Travis Vulcan Grey 89SE My Lotus Photo and Projects Album Link to post Share on other sites
fjmuurling 65 Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 MAP Sensor data for the 2 bar MAP sensor. 5V (reference voltage used) corresponds to about 204 kpa Quote Esprit Freak Link to post Share on other sites
fjmuurling 65 Posted June 8, 2016 Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 Conversion for MAP used in Freescan (which is wrong): m_pSupervisor->m_fMAP = (((float)buffer[25] - (float)130.0)/ (float)100) + (float) 1.0; // in Bar Absolute Quote Esprit Freak Link to post Share on other sites
eriks4 9 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 and this is the equation used in Espritmon (with n the 8 bit value from the mode 1 stream) com_map=n*2.0/255.0+0.08; Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pan 3 Posted August 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2016 On 30 May 2016 at 01:56, sailorbob said: I would not recommend using the PUK chip #'6 as they claim it runs 1.25 bar of boost which, when the MAP sensor can only measure up to ~2.07 bar absolute, is not not a good idea. What is the "catch" code of your ecu and the PROM ID of the original chip? I read from freescan today, the PROM ID is 1496, and so far i haven't taken the ECU out to read the catch code..sorry... is my chip MKV-s4s code? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sailorbob 263 Posted August 29, 2016 Report Share Posted August 29, 2016 0x1496 is the later S4s code (aka Mk V), the "catch" code of your ecu should be BNUB. If you check your "catch" code could you see what the Lotus part number is too please? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pan 3 Posted August 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2016 1 hour ago, sailorbob said: 0x1496 is the later S4s code (aka Mk V), the "catch" code of your ecu should be BNUB. If you check your "catch" code could you see what the Lotus part number is too please? sure..i already took a photo before 1 hour ago, sailorbob said: 0x1496 is the later S4s code (aka Mk V), the "catch" code of your ecu should be BNUB. If you check your "catch" code could you see what the Lotus part number is too please? oh..sorry...it might be the p/N of the sticker Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pan 3 Posted August 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2016 (edited) sorry...i could be wrong... EPROM ID is 1497 before i change the original chip to PUK#6 EPROM ID is 1496 with PUK#6 Edited August 29, 2016 by pan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sailorbob 263 Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 Yes, the A082U7223 part number is just for the warranty label. If the PUK#6 chip has a PROM ID of 0x1496 then PUK do not change the PROM ID to make the chip uniquely identifiable. If the original chip is 0x1497 then that's a PROM ID I've not seen before. If you can extract the binary from the chip I wouldn't mid a copy thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
eriks4 9 Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 you can use Espritmon to save the contents of the PROM to file and do a comparison. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sailorbob 263 Posted February 9, 2017 Report Share Posted February 9, 2017 OK, I can now confirm that the #6 chip raises the maximum MAP to 2.07 bar. I believe that claims of any higher boost is based upon Freescan readings which, as we know by now, are inaccurate. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.